{"id":4167,"date":"2016-03-14T10:38:28","date_gmt":"2016-03-14T15:38:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dev2.brandconstructors.com\/?p=4167"},"modified":"2025-07-02T02:01:53","modified_gmt":"2025-07-02T07:01:53","slug":"5-reasons-why-your-talented-internal-design-and-marketing-team-isnt-producing-great-results","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dev2.brandconstructors.com\/blog\/5-reasons-why-your-talented-internal-design-and-marketing-team-isnt-producing-great-results\/","title":{"rendered":"5 Reasons Why Your Talented Internal Design and Marketing Team Isn\u2019t Producing GREAT Results"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"think-outside-the-box\"Construction companies having internal design and marketing teams is on the rise. So, for the first time ever (maybe) your company has hired a few people with various skill sets to develop branding and marketing solutions. Maybe you have a clearly defined strategic plan in place to guide them… maybe you don’t. Either way, given the huge investment in personnel, equipment, software, and benefits, you just don’t feel like they are producing the results you expected from them. Can you realistically expect 2 or 3 people (maybe two designers and one writer) to have the skills, talents and capabilities of \u201cmarketing firm” of seasoned professionals? Probably not! So what can you do? Don’t cut them loose just yet. First, let\u2019s discuss the five top reasons why your internal team isn\u2019t living up to expectations. I\u2019ll even throw in some things you can do to fix it.<\/p>\n

1. No-one’s steering the Ship.<\/strong><\/span>
\nMany construction company marketing department internal teams have 1-3 designers, some not-too-long-outta-school. Let\u2019s assume you have hired the most talented people available. They are hired. The marketing team lead asks Designer 1 to create folders and brochures for the different SBUs or divisions, and maybe Designer 2 workers on a PowerPoint or two for proposal submittal presentations. When the Business Developers or Sales Team receives the materials they think \u201cthis is good stuff\u201d and they use it. Later, another need arises\u2026 they need a new trade show display – so they go through the same process: \u201cHey, Designer 3 – design us a great display\u201d and the designer produces something new. So a few weeks later, the BDs are at the trade show working to represent and sell a powerful and cohesive brand, but what the visitors see is disjointed. The cool display doesn\u2019t match the brochures, and the powerpoint they are showing doesn\u2019t match anything else. Theme, tone, message, look-and-feel… all different. Whaaaat? This is a sure sign that no-one is steering the ship.
\nCheck it out: Go and look at ALL of the work from each of the designers\/locations, and if they don\u2019t all match the same “tool box,” then you need someone to take the helm. Your marketing materials should all complement and unite the brand. Most of the time, it appears as though each piece was designed in a bubble, and no one paid attention to the other materials before starting the next job, so they created what they wanted\u2026 to the best of their abilities.
\nThe crazy thing is that it isn\u2019t even the designers fault. The designers are designing… But, if they are doing so without some serious branding guidelines, OR without an acting art director to keep things consistent, then the branding will disconnect, and you’ll have a brand marketing toolkit that doesn’t match and doesn\u2019t work.<\/p>\n

2. They lack established processes for getting it done.<\/span><\/strong><\/span>
\nWE have established processes for most major work-flows, because we develop and build similar materials and tools for many similar, but different, companies. However, most companies we audit don\u2019t have these processes in place for marketing, because they really don’t need them. Or they don\u2019t need them for EVERYTHING. This is often because much of the work the marketing team produces are one-time-projects.<\/p>\n

Let me explain:<\/span> Let\u2019s say you need a new brochure for your industrial division. If you know you are only going to develop one brochure for the division and then you won\u2019t need another for years you wouldn\u2019t invest the time creating a process for that brochure because you build them so infrequently. On the flip side – if you are going to develop a series of brochures, knowing that there will be more brochures to be developed in the future, it would make sense to create a process or work-flow for the brochure development.<\/p>\n

What we have experienced within construction companies, is that the marketing team members approach each project as they see fit. So, you will see some team members rushing through projects resulting in concepts that don\u2019t have much depth, OR you may have a team member who has created a long development process that will take days to work through for projects they receive. If nothing else – see who\u2019s process delivers the best results in the least amount of time, and have others work from that process. Or, for one-time-projects, hire an outside professional team (subcontractors) that has the experience and resources to produce quality marketing tools that will save you money in the long run because they stand the test of time. After all, isn’t that how your construction teams build right?<\/p>\n

3. They\u2019re faced with unrealistic timeframes and\/or deadlines.<\/span><\/strong><\/span>
\nThe fastest way to get mediocre results, even from the most talented designer or marketing team, is to give them too-little time to do a good job. I\u2019m not saying you need a month turnaround for every project, but you do need something realistic.
\nIf your team is working on a project that is reoccurring or very repetitive, or even if it’s something customized off of your current branding, they may only need half a day from start to finish. Sure\u2026 reformatting an ad should only be .5-1 hour project, including proofing time. But, where I see companies really cheating themselves is on a project that is NEW to them. A new ad campaign, for instance, should take a few weeks of “on-and-off work,” and a new\/revised logo (especially if it is important and highly visible) could be anywhere from 1-month to 6-months to get the best results. There are many ways to minimize\/reduce timelines, but you still shouldn\u2019t plan on creating a new “important” brand-marketing tool in two days. It may look good in two days, but will it work over the long-haul and successfully with your entire brand-marketing toolkit? Take some time to develop the best results!<\/p>\n

Enter your email to read more:<\/h2>\n


\n